Posts

REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE U.N. CONCERNING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES BY LANDLORD AKELIUS CANADA LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES IN GERMANY AND ENGLAND

-
Image
LINK TO AKELIUS CANADA TORONTO TENANTS YOUTUBE CHANNEL UN accuses Toronto apartment owner of human rights abuses CBC REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONCERNING AKELIUS RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS PRACTICES IN CANADA, GERMANY AND ENGLAND Country:  Canada City / Location:  country-wide Period / Date:  since 2014 - ongoing Subject:  Information received concerning the impact of Akelius Canada’s business model on the right to housing of tenants in Akelius’ apartment blocks in Toronto and Montréal, which illustrates the negative impact of financialization of housing in Canada. LINK TO REPORT 27 Apr 2020 Canada AL CAN 1/2020 Country:  Other actors City / Location:  country-wide Period / Date:  since 2014 - ongoing Subject:  Information received regarding the impact of the business model of real-estate company Akelius on the human rights of tenants in the apartment blocks it owns in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. LINK TO REPORT 27 Apr 2020 Akelius Residential Property AB AL OTH 33/2
Post a Comment
Read more

Akelius Canada Ltd. outmaneuvered by The Wynn Group of Companies in their sale of eight buildings to Timbercreek Asset Management

-
LINK TO AKELIUS CANADA TORONTO TENANTS YOUTUBE CHANNEL CASE BROUGHT BY AKELIUS CANADA LTD CITATION :   Akelius  Canada Inc. v. 2436196 Ontario Inc. et al., 2018 ONSC 6138                                                                                                   COURT FILE NO.:  CV-16-547529 MOTION HEARD:  20180613 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE:                   Akelius  Canada Inc., Plaintiff AND: 2436196 Ontario Inc. and B’nai Fishel Corporation, Defendants BEFORE:       Master P.T. Sugunasiri COUNSEL:    Calina, V., Counsel for the Plaintiff/Moving Party Clark, S., Counsel for the Defendants HEARD:          June 13, 2018 REASONS FOR DECISION   [ 1 ]                 The Plaintiff and Defendants are sophisticated parties to a commercial real estate contract involving eight properties in Toronto (“Properties”). The transaction was set to close on January 7, 2016. However, due to what the Plaintiff characterizes are breaches on the part of the Defendants, the transaction
Read more